Managing 67 GitHub Repositories: A Personal Audit

January 11, 2025

Like many developers, my GitHub account had accumulated repositories over the years - 67 to be exact. A mix of active projects, learning experiments, abandoned ideas, and forked repos. It was time for a comprehensive audit.

The Challenge

Managing dozens of repositories becomes chaotic without a system:

  • Which projects are actually active?
  • What needs archiving or deletion?
  • Where are my local clones?
  • What’s the status of each project?

My Categorization System

I organized all 67 repositories into clear categories:

📊 The Breakdown

Category Count Notes
Active Personal Projects 6 Current development work
Game Development 2 Godot engine projects
Need Decision 11 Unclear purpose or outdated
Forked Learning Repos 19 Reference material
Archived/Old Public 22 Historical projects (>5 years)
Work Projects 6 Professional repositories
Profile/Meta 2 GitHub profile and documentation

Active Personal Projects

These are my current focus areas:

py-scrips - Python utility scripts collection

  • Drone tracking system with WebSocket client
  • Data processing utilities
  • Actively maintained

Game Projects (2 repos)

  • Using Godot engine
  • RPG-style management game
  • Steppe simulation prototype

MindGlue - Personal Obsidian vault

  • Knowledge management system
  • Daily notes and task tracking
  • This very blog is documented there!

The Cleanup Strategy

1. Forked Repositories (19 repos)

Most were one-time references. My approach:

  • Keep only actively used forks
  • Delete the rest (can always re-fork if needed)
  • Saved: ~95% storage space

2. Old Public Projects (22 repos)

Projects from 2015-2018 that haven’t been touched:

  • Archive anything >5 years old
  • Keep only projects with historical significance
  • Document lessons learned before archiving

3. “Need Decision” Repos (11 repos)

The hardest category - repositories without clear purpose:

Decision Matrix:

Project Purpose Clear? Still Useful? Decision
Unknown utility Investigate then decide
Learning project Archive with notes
Half-finished tool Either finish or document
Work experiment Archive if not proprietary

Key Insights

What I Learned

  1. The 80/20 Rule Applies

    • 20% of repos get 80% of my attention
    • Most forks are never referenced again
    • Old projects rarely get resurrected
  2. Documentation Matters

    • Repositories without READMEs are forgotten
    • Even a one-line description helps future-you
    • Note WHY you created something, not just WHAT it does
  3. Local Clones Are Important

    • Track which repos you have locally
    • Sync your mental model with reality
    • Use consistent directory structures
  4. Regular Audits Help

    • Schedule quarterly reviews
    • Archive as you go, not all at once
    • Make decisions when context is fresh

My Organization System

Repository Naming Convention

<category>-<project>-<technology>
examples:
- py-scrips (personal Python scripts)
- game-company-sim (game development)
- learn-rust-basics (learning project)

README Template

Every repo should answer:

  • What is this project?
  • Why did I create it?
  • Status: Active / Maintained / Archived
  • Next actions (if active)

Tracking Document

I maintain a markdown file (like the one this post is based on) with:

  • Full repository list with URLs
  • Last updated dates
  • Current status
  • Next actions
  • Decision tracking for unclear repos

Results

After the audit:

  • Deleted: 15 forked repositories
  • Archived: 18 old public projects
  • Documented: All active projects now have clear READMEs
  • Decided: 8 out of 11 “unclear” repos now categorized
  • Peace of Mind: Know exactly what I have and where

Tools That Helped

  • GitHub CLI (gh) - List all repos programmatically
  • Obsidian - Track decisions and status
  • Scripts - Automated repo listing and status checks

Recommendations

If your GitHub account looks like chaos:

  1. Start with a full inventory

    • Use gh repo list --limit 1000 to get all repos
    • Export to markdown/CSV for review
  2. Create categories that make sense for YOU

    • Not everyone needs the same buckets
    • Group by activity level, technology, or purpose
  3. Make decisions systematically

    • Review 5-10 repos at a time
    • Don’t get overwhelmed
    • Document your reasoning
  4. Set up maintenance habits

    • Monthly check on active projects
    • Quarterly audit of the rest
    • Archive promptly when projects are done
  5. Accept that abandonment is okay

    • Not every project needs to finish
    • Archiving isn’t failure
    • Learning projects have served their purpose

Conclusion

Managing 67 repositories felt overwhelming until I systematized it. Now I have clear categories, documented decisions, and peace of mind knowing exactly what’s active and what’s historical.

Your GitHub profile is your development history - make it easy to navigate for both yourself and others.

Next audit scheduled: April 2026

Have your own system for managing multiple repositories? I’d love to hear about it!


Written by Mykyta Khmel. I write about things I build and problems I solve - from scaling self-service portals to automating DORA metrics. Sometimes 3D graphics, always pragmatic. Find me on GitHub and Threads.